ATI All-In-Wonder 9200 SE vs Radeon Pro W5500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking299not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation13.58no data
Power efficiency13.29no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameNavi 14RV280
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date10 February 2020 (6 years ago)26 January 2004 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1408no data
Core clock speed1187 MHz250 MHz
Boost clock speed1400 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,400 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)125 Wattno data
Texture fill rate123.21.000
Floating-point processing power3.942 TFLOPSno data
ROPs324
TMUs884
L2 Cache2 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8AGP 8x
Length267 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR
Maximum RAM amount8 GB128 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz164 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s2.624 GB/s
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort1x VGA, 2x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)8.1
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.61.4
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 February 2020 26 January 2004
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 7 nm 150 nm

Pro W5500 has an age advantage of 16 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2043% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro W5500 and All-In-Wonder 9200 SE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro W5500 is a workstation graphics card while All-In-Wonder 9200 SE is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 91 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W5500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate All-In-Wonder 9200 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro W5500 or All-In-Wonder 9200 SE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.