UHD Graphics G1 vs Radeon Pro Vega II

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking141not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.65no data
Power efficiency6.11no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)Generation 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code nameVega 20Ice Lake GT1
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date3 June 2019 (7 years ago)29 May 2019 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096256
Core clock speed1574 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1720 MHz900 MHz
Number of transistors13,230 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)475 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate440.314.40
Floating-point processing power14.09 TFLOPS0.4608 TFLOPS
ROPs648
TMUs25616
L1 Cache1 MBno data
L2 Cache4 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceApple MPXPCIe 3.0 x1
WidthQuad-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount32 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width4096 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed806 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth825.3 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.0b, 4x ThunderboltNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.76.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.1
Vulkan1.31.1.97

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 475 Watt 15 Watt

Pro Vega II has a 43% more advanced lithography process.

UHD Graphics G1, on the other hand, has 3067% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro Vega II and UHD Graphics G1. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro Vega II is a workstation graphics card while UHD Graphics G1 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 81 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega II on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 211 votes

Rate UHD Graphics G1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro Vega II or UHD Graphics G1, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.