Radeon 520 Mobile GDDR5 vs Pro Vega II Duo

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking183not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.17no data
Power efficiency5.35no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameVega 20Banks
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date3 June 2019 (7 years ago)18 April 2017 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,399 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096 ×2320
Core clock speed1400 MHz1030 MHz
Boost clock speed1720 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,230 million690 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)475 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate440.3 ×220.60
Floating-point processing power14.09 TFLOPS ×20.6592 TFLOPS
ROPs64 ×28
TMUs256 ×220
L1 Cache1 MB80 KB
L2 Cache4 MB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceApple MPXPCIe 3.0 x8
WidthQuad-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount32 GB ×22 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit ×264 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1125 MHz
Memory bandwidth1.02 TB/s ×236 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.0b, 4x ThunderboltPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.76.5 (5.1)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.1 (1.2)
Vulkan1.31.2.170

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 June 2019 18 April 2017
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 475 Watt 50 Watt

Pro Vega II Duo has an age advantage of 2 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

520 Mobile GDDR5, on the other hand, has 850% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro Vega II Duo and Radeon 520 Mobile GDDR5. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro Vega II Duo is a workstation graphics card while Radeon 520 Mobile GDDR5 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 183 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega II Duo on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 19 votes

Rate Radeon 520 Mobile GDDR5 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro Vega II Duo or Radeon 520 Mobile GDDR5, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.