UHD Graphics 910 vs Radeon Pro Vega 64X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking195not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency9.93no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Generation 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code nameVega 10Ice Lake GT2
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date19 March 2019 (7 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096256
Core clock speed1250 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1468 MHz1000 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate375.816.00
Floating-point processing power12.03 TFLOPS0.512 TFLOPS
ROPs648
TMUs25616
L1 Cache1 MBno data
L2 Cache4 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x1
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount16 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width2048 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.1.125-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 15 Watt

UHD Graphics 910 has a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 1567% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro Vega 64X and UHD Graphics 910. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro Vega 64X is a mobile workstation graphics card while UHD Graphics 910 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 38 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 64X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 9 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 910 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro Vega 64X or UHD Graphics 910, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.