ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT AGP vs Pro Vega 64

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking205not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency9.57no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameVega 10RV630
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date27 June 2017 (9 years ago)28 June 2007 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096120
Core clock speed1250 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed1350 MHzno data
Number of transistors12,500 million390 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate345.66.400
Floating-point processing power11.06 TFLOPS0.192 TFLOPS
ROPs644
TMUs2568
L1 Cache1 MBno data
L2 Cache4 MB64 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 8x
Length267 mmno data
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount16 GB256 MB
Memory bus width2048 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed786 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth402.4 GB/s25.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)10.0 (10_0)
Shader Model6.44.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.1.125N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 June 2017 28 June 2007
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 45 Watt

Pro Vega 64 has an age advantage of 9 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 364% more advanced lithography process.

ATI HD 2600 XT AGP, on the other hand, has 456% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro Vega 64 and Radeon HD 2600 XT AGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro Vega 64 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon HD 2600 XT AGP is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 23 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 64 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 7 votes

Rate Radeon HD 2600 XT AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro Vega 64 or Radeon HD 2600 XT AGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.