FirePro S9170 vs Radeon Pro Vega 64

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking205not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency9.57no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameVega 10Hawaii
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date27 June 2017 (9 years ago)8 July 2015 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40962816
Core clock speed1250 MHz930 MHz
Boost clock speed1350 MHzno data
Number of transistors12,500 million6,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt275 Watt
Texture fill rate345.6163.7
Floating-point processing power11.06 TFLOPS5.238 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs256176
L1 Cache1 MB704 KB
L2 Cache4 MB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount16 GB32 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed786 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth402.4 GB/s320.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.46.3
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.1.1251.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 June 2017 8 July 2015
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 275 Watt

Pro Vega 64 has an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 10% lower power consumption.

FirePro S9170, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro Vega 64 and FirePro S9170. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 23 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 64 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 4 votes

Rate FirePro S9170 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro Vega 64 or FirePro S9170, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.