RTX A400 vs Radeon Pro V620

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro V620 and RTX A400, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Pro V620
2021
32 GB GDDR6, 300 Watt
63.65
+343%

Pro V620 outperforms RTX A400 by a whopping 343% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking37407
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency16.4122.23
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameNavi 21GA107
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date4 November 2021 (4 years ago)16 April 2024 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4608768
Core clock speed1825 MHz727 MHz
Boost clock speed2200 MHz1762 MHz
Number of transistors26,800 million8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate633.642.29
Floating-point processing power20.28 TFLOPS2.706 TFLOPS
ROPs12816
TMUs28824
Tensor Coresno data24
Ray Tracing Cores726
L0 Cache1.1 MBno data
L1 Cache1 MBno data
L2 Cache4 MBno data
L3 Cache128 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length267 mm163 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount32 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s96 GB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Pro V620 63.65
+343%
RTX A400 14.37

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro V620 26519
+343%
Samples: 3
RTX A400 5986
Samples: 676

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 63.65 14.37
Recency 4 November 2021 16 April 2024
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 50 Watt

Pro V620 has a 343% higher aggregate performance score, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 14% more advanced lithography process.

RTX A400, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 500% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro V620 is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX A400 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate Radeon Pro V620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 55 votes

Rate RTX A400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro V620 or RTX A400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.