GeForce RTX 4080 Max-Q vs Radeon Pro V620

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking37not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency16.41no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 21AD104
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date4 November 2021 (4 years ago)3 January 2023 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores46087424
Core clock speed1825 MHz795 MHz
Boost clock speed2200 MHz1350 MHz
Number of transistors26,800 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate633.6313.2
Floating-point processing power20.28 TFLOPS20.04 TFLOPS
ROPs12880
TMUs288232
Tensor Coresno data232
Ray Tracing Cores7258
L0 Cache1.1 MBno data
L1 Cache1 MB7.3 MB
L2 Cache4 MB48 MB
L3 Cache128 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount32 GB12 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s336.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 November 2021 3 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 60 Watt

Pro V620 has a 167% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX 4080 Max-Q, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro V620 and GeForce RTX 4080 Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro V620 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 4080 Max-Q is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate Radeon Pro V620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 6 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4080 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro V620 or GeForce RTX 4080 Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.