H200 NVL vs Radeon Pro V340

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking606not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.30no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Hopper (2022−2024)
GPU code nameVega 10GH100
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date26 August 2018 (7 years ago)18 November 2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores358416896
Core clock speed852 MHz1365 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHz1785 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million80,000 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)230 Watt600 Watt
Texture fill rate336.0942.5
Floating-point processing power10.75 TFLOPS60.32 TFLOPS
ROPs6424
TMUs224528
Tensor Coresno data528
L1 Cache896 KB33 MB
L2 Cache4 MB50 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2HBM3e
Maximum RAM amount16 GB141 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit6144 Bit
Memory clock speed945 MHz1593 MHz
Memory bandwidth483.8 GB/s4.89 TB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)N/A
Shader Model6.4N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.1.125N/A
CUDA-9.0
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Pro V340 54819
H200 NVL 335140
+511%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 August 2018 18 November 2024
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 141 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 230 Watt 600 Watt

Pro V340 has 161% lower power consumption.

H200 NVL, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 781% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro V340 and H200 NVL. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Radeon Pro V340 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 44 votes

Rate H200 NVL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro V340 or H200 NVL, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.