GeForce2 MX + nForce 220 vs Radeon Pro V340

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking612not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.31no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameVega 10Crush11
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date26 August 2018 (8 years ago)4 June 2001 (25 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3584no data
Core clock speed852 MHz175 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHzno data
Number of transistors12,500 million20 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)230 Wattno data
Texture fill rate336.00.7
Floating-point processing power10.75 TFLOPSno data
ROPs642
TMUs2244
L1 Cache896 KBno data
L2 Cache4 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 4x
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount16 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width2048 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed945 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth483.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)7.0
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.61.2
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.1.125N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 August 2018 4 June 2001
Chip lithography 14 nm 180 nm

Pro V340 has an age advantage of 17 years, and a 92% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro V340 and GeForce2 MX + nForce 220. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro V340 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce2 MX + nForce 220 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Radeon Pro V340 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 1 vote

Rate GeForce2 MX nForce 220 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro V340 or GeForce2 MX + nForce 220, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.