GRID A100A vs Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking609not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.77no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameVega 10GA100
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date26 August 2018 (8 years ago)14 May 2020 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3584 ×26912
Core clock speed1000 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHz1005 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt400 Watt
Texture fill rate336.0 ×2434.2
Floating-point processing power10.75 TFLOPS ×213.89 TFLOPS
ROPs64 ×2192
TMUs224 ×2432
Tensor Coresno data432
L1 Cache896 KB20.3 MB
L2 Cache4 MB48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount16 GB ×248 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit ×26144 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1215 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s ×21,866 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.1.1251.2
CUDA-8.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 August 2018 14 May 2020
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 48 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 400 Watt

Pro V340 MxGPU has 33% lower power consumption.

GRID A100A, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU and GRID A100A. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1 vote

Rate Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 10 votes

Rate GRID A100A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU or GRID A100A, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.