Tegra 4i vs Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)VLIW Vec4 (2010−2013)
GPU code nameVega 10Tegra 4
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date29 June 2017 (9 years ago)19 February 2013 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3584 ×2no data
Core clock speed852 MHz660 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHzno data
Number of transistors12,500 million11 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)230 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rate224.0 ×21.320
Floating-point processing power7.168 TFLOPS ×2no data
ROPs64 ×22
TMUs224 ×22
L1 Cache896 KBno data
L2 Cache4 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount16 GB ×2System Shared
Memory bus width2048 Bit ×2System Shared
Memory clock speed945 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth483.8 GB/s ×2no data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)N/A
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6ES 3.0
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.1.125N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 June 2017 19 February 2013
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 230 Watt 20 Watt

Pro V320 MxGPU has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Tegra 4i, on the other hand, has 1050% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU and Tegra 4i. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU is a workstation graphics card while Tegra 4i is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1 vote

Rate Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Tegra 4i on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU or Tegra 4i, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.