ATI All-In-Wonder X600 vs Radeon Pro Duo Polaris

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Rage 9 (2003−2006)
GPU code nameEllesmereRV370
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date24 April 2017 (9 years ago)1 July 2005 (21 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304 ×2no data
Core clock speed1243 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistors5,700 million107 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Wattno data
Texture fill rate179.0 ×21.600
Floating-point processing power5.728 TFLOPS ×2no data
ROPs32 ×24
TMUs144 ×24
L1 Cache576 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length305 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount16 GB ×2256 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit ×2128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz300 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s ×29.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.0b, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a1x DVI, 1x VGA
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)9.0
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL2.1N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 April 2017 1 July 2005
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 110 nm

Pro Duo Polaris has an age advantage of 11 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 686% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and All-In-Wonder X600. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro Duo Polaris is a workstation graphics card while All-In-Wonder X600 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 35 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Duo Polaris on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate All-In-Wonder X600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro Duo Polaris or All-In-Wonder X600, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.