Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile vs Pro 580

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking338not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency9.60no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code namePolaris 20Vega 10
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date5 June 2017 (9 years ago)1 June 2018 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23043584
Core clock speed1100 MHz1138 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHz1301 MHz
Number of transistors5,700 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate172.8291.4
Floating-point processing power5.53 TFLOPS9.326 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs144224
L1 Cache576 KB896 KB
L2 Cache2 MB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed1695 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth217.0 GB/s409.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.125

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 June 2017 1 June 2018
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 120 Watt

RX Vega 56 Mobile has an age advantage of 11 months, and 25% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro 580 and Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 580 is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 77 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 9 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro 580 or Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.