Arc Pro A40 vs Radeon Pro 575

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Xe-HPG (2022−2024)
GPU code namePolaris 20DG2-128
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date5 June 2017 (9 years ago)8 August 2022 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20481024
Core clock speed1096 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1700 MHz
Number of transistors5,700 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate140.3108.8
Floating-point processing power4.489 TFLOPSno data
ROPs3232
TMUs12864
Ray Tracing Coresno data8
L1 Cache512 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB6 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed1695 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth217.0 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.4

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 June 2017 8 August 2022
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 50 Watt

Arc Pro A40 has an age advantage of 5 years, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 133% more advanced lithography process, and 140% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro 575 and Arc Pro A40. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 575 is a mobile workstation graphics card while Arc Pro A40 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 100 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 575 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 15 votes

Rate Arc Pro A40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro 575 or Arc Pro A40, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.