Radeon RX 5300 vs Pro 570X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated343
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data14.12
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code namePolaris 20Navi 14
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date18 March 2019 (7 years ago)28 May 2020 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17921408
Core clock speed1000 MHz1327 MHz
Boost clock speed1105 MHz1645 MHz
Number of transistors5,700 million6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate123.8144.8
Floating-point processing power3.96 TFLOPS4.632 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs11288
L1 Cache448 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MB1536 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data180 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB3 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed1700 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth217.6 GB/s168.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Pro 570X 27871
RX 5300 39007
+40%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 March 2019 28 May 2020
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 3 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 100 Watt

Pro 570X has a 33% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RX 5300, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 20% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro 570X and Radeon RX 5300. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 570X is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 5300 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 46 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 570X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 47 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro 570X or Radeon RX 5300, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.