GMA 3150 vs Radeon Pro 5700
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 237 | 1617 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 16.36 | no data |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) | Generation 4.0 (2006−2007) |
| GPU code name | Navi 10 | Pineview |
| Market segment | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 4 August 2020 (6 years ago) | 9 May 2007 (19 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2304 | 16 |
| Core clock speed | 1243 MHz | 400 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1350 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 10,300 million | 123 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 13 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 194.4 | 0.8 |
| Floating-point processing power | 6.221 TFLOPS | 0.0128 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64 | 1 |
| TMUs | 144 | 2 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCI |
| Width | IGP | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | System Shared |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | System Shared |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | System Shared |
| Memory bandwidth | 384.0 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | - | + |
| Resizable BAR | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 9.0c |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.0 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | N/A |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | N/A |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 4 August 2020 | 9 May 2007 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 13 Watt |
Pro 5700 has an age advantage of 13 years, and a 543% more advanced lithography process.
GMA 3150, on the other hand, has 900% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro 5700 and GMA 3150. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon Pro 5700 is a workstation graphics card while GMA 3150 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
