Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD vs Radeon Pro 560X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking545not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency9.11no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Gen. 4.5 (2008)
GPU code namePolaris 21Montevina
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date16 July 2018 (8 years ago)1 October 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores102410
Core clock speed1004 MHz533 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Wattno data
Texture fill rate64.26no data
Floating-point processing power2.056 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs64no data
L1 Cache256 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1270 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth81.28 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)10
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Pro 560X 32449
+22279%
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD 145

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 July 2018 1 October 2008
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm

Pro 560X has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 364% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro 560X and Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 560X is a mobile workstation graphics card while Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 209 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 560X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 261 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro 560X or Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.