Arc A550M vs Radeon Pro 5600M
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon Pro 5600M with Arc A550M, including specs and performance data.
A550M outperforms Pro 5600M by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 288 | 280 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 34.41 | 29.25 |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) | Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) |
| GPU code name | Navi 12 | DG2-512 |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 15 June 2020 (6 years ago) | 2022 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2560 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1030 MHz | 2050 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 21,700 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 6 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 60 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 164.8 | 262.4 |
| Floating-point processing power | 5.274 TFLOPS | 8.397 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 160 | 128 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 256 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 16 |
| L1 Cache | no data | 3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 8 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | 2048 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 770 MHz | 1750 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 394.2 GB/s | 224.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
| Resizable BAR | + | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | Portable Device Dependent |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.6 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3 |
| DLSS | - | + |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 120−130
−1.6%
|
130−140
+1.6%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 45−50
−2%
|
50−55
+2%
|
| Palworld | 55−60
−3.6%
|
55−60
+3.6%
|
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 50−55
−1.9%
|
50−55
+1.9%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 90−95
−1.1%
|
90−95
+1.1%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 120−130
−1.6%
|
130−140
+1.6%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 45−50
−2%
|
50−55
+2%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 70−75
−2.7%
|
75−80
+2.7%
|
| Fortnite | 110−120
−0.9%
|
110−120
+0.9%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 90−95
−2.2%
|
90−95
+2.2%
|
| Palworld | 55−60
−3.6%
|
55−60
+3.6%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 85−90
−2.3%
|
90−95
+2.3%
|
| Valorant | 150−160
−1.3%
|
160−170
+1.3%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 90−95
−1.1%
|
90−95
+1.1%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 120−130
−1.6%
|
130−140
+1.6%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 250−260
−1.2%
|
250−260
+1.2%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 45−50
−2%
|
50−55
+2%
|
| Dota 2 | 110−120
−0.8%
|
120−130
+0.8%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 70−75
−2.7%
|
75−80
+2.7%
|
| Fortnite | 110−120
−0.9%
|
110−120
+0.9%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 90−95
−2.2%
|
90−95
+2.2%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 80−85
−1.2%
|
80−85
+1.2%
|
| Metro Exodus | 50−55
−2%
|
50−55
+2%
|
| Palworld | 55−60
−3.6%
|
55−60
+3.6%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 85−90
−2.3%
|
90−95
+2.3%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 65−70
−3%
|
65−70
+3%
|
| Valorant | 150−160
−1.3%
|
160−170
+1.3%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 90−95
−1.1%
|
90−95
+1.1%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 45−50
−2%
|
50−55
+2%
|
| Dota 2 | 110−120
−0.8%
|
120−130
+0.8%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 70−75
−2.7%
|
75−80
+2.7%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 90−95
−2.2%
|
90−95
+2.2%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 85−90
−2.3%
|
90−95
+2.3%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 65−70
−3%
|
65−70
+3%
|
| Valorant | 150−160
−1.3%
|
160−170
+1.3%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 110−120
−0.9%
|
110−120
+0.9%
|
| Palworld | 55−60
−3.6%
|
55−60
+3.6%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 45−50
−2.1%
|
45−50
+2.1%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 160−170
−1.9%
|
160−170
+1.9%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 40−45
−2.4%
|
40−45
+2.4%
|
| Metro Exodus | 30−33
−3.3%
|
30−35
+3.3%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180
+0%
|
170−180
+0%
|
| Valorant | 180−190
−1.1%
|
180−190
+1.1%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 60−65
−1.6%
|
65−70
+1.6%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 21−24
−4.5%
|
21−24
+4.5%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 50−55
−1.9%
|
50−55
+1.9%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 55−60
−1.7%
|
55−60
+1.7%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 35−40
−2.8%
|
35−40
+2.8%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 50−55
−1.9%
|
55−60
+1.9%
|
| Palworld | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 21−24
−4.5%
|
21−24
+4.5%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 40−45
−2.4%
|
40−45
+2.4%
|
| Metro Exodus | 18−20
−5.3%
|
20−22
+5.3%
|
| Palworld | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 30−35
−3%
|
30−35
+3%
|
| Valorant | 120−130
−2.4%
|
120−130
+2.4%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 35−40
−2.9%
|
35−40
+2.9%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 21−24
−4.5%
|
21−24
+4.5%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 9−10
−11.1%
|
10−11
+11.1%
|
| Dota 2 | 75−80
−2.7%
|
75−80
+2.7%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 24−27
−3.8%
|
27−30
+3.8%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 24−27
−4.2%
|
24−27
+4.2%
|
| Palworld | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Arc A550M is 11% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Arc A550M performs better in 59 tests (91%)
- there's a draw in 6 tests (9%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 22.24 | 22.69 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 6 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 60 Watt |
Pro 5600M has 20% lower power consumption.
Arc A550M, on the other hand, has a 2% higher aggregate performance score, and a 17% more advanced lithography process.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon Pro 5600M and Arc A550M.
Be aware that Radeon Pro 5600M is a mobile workstation graphics card while Arc A550M is a mobile workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
