GeForce GTX 295 Single PCB vs Radeon Pro 560
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 559 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 8.60 | no data |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) | Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013) |
| GPU code name | Polaris 21 | GT200B |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 18 April 2017 (9 years ago) | 16 June 2009 (17 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $499 |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1024 | 240 ×2 |
| Core clock speed | 907 MHz | 576 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 3,000 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 55 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 289 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 58.05 | 46.08 ×2 |
| Floating-point processing power | 1.858 TFLOPS | 0.5962 TFLOPS ×2 |
| ROPs | 16 | 28 ×2 |
| TMUs | 64 | 80 ×2 |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | no data |
| L2 Cache | 1024 KB | 224 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 267 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 896 MB ×2 |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 448 Bit ×2 |
| Memory clock speed | 1270 MHz | 1008 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 81.28 GB/s | 112.9 GB/s ×2 |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| FreeSync | + | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | - | 1.3 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 18 April 2017 | 16 June 2009 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 896 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 55 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 289 Watt |
Pro 560 has an age advantage of 7 years, a 357% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 293% more advanced lithography process, and 285% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro 560 and GeForce GTX 295 Single PCB. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon Pro 560 is a mobile workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 295 Single PCB is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
