GMA 3100 vs Radeon Pro 560

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking559not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.60no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Generation 4.0 (2006−2007)
GPU code namePolaris 21Bearlake
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date18 April 2017 (9 years ago)9 May 2007 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024no data
Core clock speed907 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate58.051.600
Floating-point processing power1.858 TFLOPSno data
ROPs164
TMUs644
L1 Cache256 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 1.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1270 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth81.28 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)9.0c
Shader Model6.43.0
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 April 2017 9 May 2007
Chip lithography 14 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 13 Watt

Pro 560 has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 543% more advanced lithography process.

GMA 3100, on the other hand, has 477% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro 560 and GMA 3100. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 560 is a mobile workstation graphics card while GMA 3100 is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 116 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 560 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 339 votes

Rate GMA 3100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro 560 or GMA 3100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.