Radeon Instinct MI200 vs Pro 555

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking595not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.79no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)CDNA 2.0 (2021−2022)
GPU code namePolaris 21Aldebaran
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date5 June 2017 (9 years ago)8 November 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7686656
Core clock speed850 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1700 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million58,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate40.80707.2
Floating-point processing power1.306 TFLOPS22.63 TFLOPS
ROPs16no data
TMUs48416
L1 Cache192 KB1.6 MB
L2 Cache1024 KB16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno dataOAM Module
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount2 GB64 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed1275 MHz1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth81.6 GB/s1.64 TB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)N/A
Shader Model6.4N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 June 2017 8 November 2021
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 64 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 300 Watt

Pro 555 has 75% lower power consumption.

Instinct MI200, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 57% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro 555 and Radeon Instinct MI200. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 555 is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon Instinct MI200 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 101 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 555 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 17 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro 555 or Radeon Instinct MI200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.