GeForce G103M vs Radeon Pro 5500 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking328not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency11.69no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameNavi 14G98
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date4 August 2020 (6 years ago)1 September 2009 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores15368
Core clock speed1187 MHz640 MHz
Boost clock speed1757 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,400 million210 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt14 Watt
Texture fill rate168.75.120
Floating-point processing power5.398 TFLOPS0.0256 TFLOPS
ROPs324
TMUs968
L2 Cache2 MB16 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 1.0 x16
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR2
Maximum RAM amount8 GB512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s8 GB/s
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.54.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2N/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 August 2020 1 September 2009
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 7 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 14 Watt

Pro 5500 XT has an age advantage of 10 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 829% more advanced lithography process.

GeForce G103M, on the other hand, has 793% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro 5500 XT and GeForce G103M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 5500 XT is a workstation graphics card while GeForce G103M is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 73 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5500 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 36 votes

Rate GeForce G103M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro 5500 XT or GeForce G103M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.