Arc 8-Core iGPU vs Radeon Pro 5500 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Pro 5300 Pro 5500 XT Pro V520 Pro W5500 Pro W5500X Pro W5700 Pro W5700X
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Arc 7-Core iGPU Arc 7-Cores iGPU Arc 8-Core iGPU 4-Core iGPU (Arc) 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro 5500 XT with Arc 8-Core iGPU, including specs and performance data.

Pro 5500 XT
2020
8 GB GDDR6, 125 Watt
18.89
+16.8%

Pro 5500 XT outperforms 8-Core iGPU by a moderate 17% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Pro 5500 XT Pro 5500 XT
Arc 8-Core iGPU Arc 8-Core iGPU

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking328370
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency11.69no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Xe LPG (2023−2025)
GPU code nameNavi 14Meteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date4 August 2020 (6 years ago)14 December 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores15368
Core clock speed1187 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1757 MHz2300 MHz
Number of transistors6,400 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)125 Wattno data
Texture fill rate168.7no data
Floating-point processing power5.398 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs96no data
L1 Cacheno data1.5 MB
L2 Cache2 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8no data
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount8 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1750 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_2
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD40−45
+14.3%
35
−14.3%
1440p18−20
+5.9%
17
−5.9%
4K16−18
+14.3%
14
−14.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 111
+0%
111
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Palworld 41
+0%
41
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 40
+0%
40
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 85
+0%
85
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 39
+0%
39
+0%
Fortnite 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Palworld 37
+0%
37
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 42
+0%
42
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 36
+0%
36
+0%
Fortnite 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 25
+0%
25
+0%
Metro Exodus 28
+0%
28
+0%
Palworld 30
+0%
30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50
+0%
50
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 34
+0%
34
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24
+0%
24
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Palworld 27
+0%
27
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 11
+0%
11
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Valorant 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 32
+0%
32
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Palworld 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 9
+0%
9
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Palworld 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Valorant 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Palworld 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

This is how Pro 5500 XT and Arc 8-Core iGPU compete in popular games:

  • Pro 5500 XT is 14% faster in 1080p
  • Pro 5500 XT is 6% faster in 1440p
  • Pro 5500 XT is 14% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 62 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 18.89 16.17
Recency 4 August 2020 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm

Pro 5500 XT has a 17% higher aggregate performance score.

Arc 8-Core iGPU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro 5500 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc 8-Core iGPU in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 5500 XT is a workstation graphics card while Arc 8-Core iGPU is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Pro 5500 XT Radeon Pro 5500 XT
vs
Pro WX 7100 Radeon Pro WX 7100
Arc 8-Core iGPU Arc 8 Core iGPU
vs
GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Pro 5500 XT Radeon Pro 5500 XT
vs
Quadro K6000 Quadro K6000
Pro 5500 XT Radeon Pro 5500 XT
vs
Xbox XGPU-S XGPU S
Pro 5500 XT Radeon Pro 5500 XT
vs
RTX 3060 Ti RTX 3060 Ti
Pro 5500 XT Radeon Pro 5500 XT
vs
RX 6300M RX 6300M
Pro 5500 XT Radeon Pro 5500 XT
vs
9300M GS DDR2 GeForce 9300M GS DDR2
Pro 5500 XT Radeon Pro 5500 XT
vs
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
Pro 5500 XT Radeon Pro 5500 XT
vs
RTX 5070 Ti Mobile RTX 5070 Ti Mobile
Pro 5500 XT Radeon Pro 5500 XT
vs
RX 9060 XT 16 GB RX 9060 XT 16 GB
Pro 5700 Radeon Pro 5700
vs
ATI Rage Mobility-M Mobility M
Pro 5700 Radeon Pro 5700
vs
530X Mobile Radeon 530X Mobile
Pro 5700 Radeon Pro 5700
vs
GTX 1050 3 GB Max-Q GTX 1050 3 GB Max-Q

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.6 73 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5500 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 110 votes

Rate Arc 8-Core iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro 5500 XT or Arc 8-Core iGPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.