Tesla K80m vs Radeon Pro 5300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking360not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency15.46no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)
GPU code nameNavi 14GK210
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date4 August 2020 (6 years ago)17 November 2014 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12802x 2496
Core clock speed1000 MHz562 MHz
Boost clock speed1650 MHz824 MHz
Number of transistors6,400 million7,100 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate132.02x 182.2 billion/sec
Floating-point processing power4.224 TFLOPSno data
ROPs322x 48
TMUs802x 208
L2 Cache2 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2x 12 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit2x 384 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s2x 240.6 GB/s
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12.0 (11_1)
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 August 2020 17 November 2014
Chip lithography 7 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 300 Watt

Pro 5300 has an age advantage of 5 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 253% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro 5300 and Tesla K80m. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 101 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 13 votes

Rate Tesla K80m on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro 5300 or Tesla K80m, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.