Edge 3D 3240XL vs Radeon Pro 5300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking362not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency15.47no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)no data
GPU code nameNavi 14NV1
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date4 August 2020 (6 years ago)30 September 1995 (30 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280no data
Core clock speed1000 MHz60 MHz
Boost clock speed1650 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,400 million1 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm500 nm
Power consumption (TDP)85 Wattno data
Texture fill rate132.00.06
Floating-point processing power4.224 TFLOPSno data
ROPs321
TMUs801
L2 Cache2 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCI
Lengthno data191 mm
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6VRAM
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz60 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s480 MB/s
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)1.0
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 August 2020 30 September 1995
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 MB
Chip lithography 7 nm 500 nm

Pro 5300 has an age advantage of 24 years, a 204700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 7043% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro 5300 and Edge 3D 3240XL. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 5300 is a workstation graphics card while Edge 3D 3240XL is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 101 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Edge 3D 3240XL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro 5300 or Edge 3D 3240XL, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.