GeForce 8200M G mGPU vs Radeon Pro 455

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking592not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency16.51no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameBaffinC77
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date30 October 2016 (9 years ago)3 June 2008 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores76816
Core clock speed855 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million210 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt12 Watt
Texture fill rate41.041.600
Floating-point processing power1.313 TFLOPS0.0256 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs484
L1 Cache192 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1270 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth81.28 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.44.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 October 2016 3 June 2008
Chip lithography 14 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 12 Watt

Pro 455 has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 471% more advanced lithography process.

8200M G mGPU, on the other hand, has 192% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro 455 and GeForce 8200M G mGPU AMD. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 455 is a mobile workstation graphics card while GeForce 8200M G mGPU AMD is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 18 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 455 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce 8200M G mGPU AMD on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro 455 or GeForce 8200M G mGPU AMD, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.