FirePro S9300 X2 vs Radeon PRO WX 9100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking233not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.74no data
Power efficiency9.47no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameVega 10Capsaicin
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date10 July 2017 (9 years ago)31 March 2016 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,599 $5,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40964096 ×2
Core clock speed1200 MHz850 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHzno data
Number of transistors12,500 million8,900 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)230 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate384.0217.6 ×2
Floating-point processing power12.29 TFLOPS6.963 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs6464 ×2
TMUs256256 ×2
L1 Cache1 MB1 MB
L2 Cache4 MB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2HBM
Maximum RAM amount16 GB4 GB ×2
Memory bus width2048 Bit4096 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed945 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth483.8 GB/s512.0 GB/s ×2

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors6x mini-DisplayPortNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.46.0
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.1.1251.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 July 2017 31 March 2016
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 230 Watt 300 Watt

PRO WX 9100 has an age advantage of 1 year, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 30% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon PRO WX 9100 and FirePro S9300 X2. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 35 votes

Rate Radeon PRO WX 9100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 8 votes

Rate FirePro S9300 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon PRO WX 9100 or FirePro S9300 X2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.