Arc G3 vs Radeon PRO WX 9100

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking231not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.74no data
Power efficiency9.47no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Xe3-LPG (2026)
GPU code nameVega 10Panther Lake
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date10 July 2017 (9 years ago)1 June 2026 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40961280
Core clock speed1200 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHz2400 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)230 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate384.096.00
Floating-point processing power12.29 TFLOPS6.144 TFLOPS
ROPs6420
TMUs25640
Ray Tracing Coresno data10
L1 Cache1 MB640 KB
L2 Cache4 MB16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount16 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width2048 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed945 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth483.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors6x mini-DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.9
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.1.1251.4

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 July 2017 1 June 2026
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 230 Watt 25 Watt

Arc G3 has an age advantage of 8 years, a 367% more advanced lithography process, and 820% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon PRO WX 9100 and Arc G3. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon PRO WX 9100 is a workstation graphics card while Arc G3 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 35 votes

Rate Radeon PRO WX 9100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 2 votes

Rate Arc G3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon PRO WX 9100 or Arc G3, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.