Rubin GPU vs Radeon PRO W7900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking26not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.44no data
Power efficiency17.49no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)Rubin (2026−2027)
GPU code nameNavi 31GR100
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date13 April 2023 (3 years ago)2026 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores614428672
Core clock speed1855 MHz700 MHz
Boost clock speed2495 MHz2267 MHz
Number of transistors57,700 million336,000 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)295 Watt2300 Watt
Texture fill rate958.12,031.2
Floating-point processing power61.32 TFLOPS130 TFLOPS
ROPs19224
TMUs384896
Tensor Coresno data896
Ray Tracing Cores96no data
L0 Cache3 MBno data
L1 Cache3 MB56 MB
L2 Cache6 MB128 MB
L3 Cache96 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 6.0 x16
Length280 mmno data
Width3-slotSXM Module
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6HBM4
Maximum RAM amount48 GB288 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit16384 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz2695 MHz
Memory bandwidth864.0 GB/s22.1 TB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors3x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1No outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)N/A
Shader Model6.7N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL2.23.0
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA-10.7
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 48 GB 288 GB
Chip lithography 5 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 295 Watt 2300 Watt

PRO W7900 has 680% lower power consumption.

Rubin GPU, on the other hand, has a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 67% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon PRO W7900 and Rubin GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 90 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.9 242 votes

Rate Rubin GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon PRO W7900 or Rubin GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.