N1 16SM vs Radeon PRO W7900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking26not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.44no data
Power efficiency17.49no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameNavi 31GB20B
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date13 April 2023 (3 years ago)1 June 2026 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores61442048
Core clock speed1855 MHz741 MHz
Boost clock speed2495 MHz2346 MHz
Number of transistors57,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology5 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)295 Wattno data
Texture fill rate958.1300.3
Floating-point processing power61.32 TFLOPS9.609 TFLOPS
ROPs19224
TMUs384128
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Cores9616
L0 Cache3 MBno data
L1 Cache3 MB2 MB
L2 Cache6 MB50 MB
L3 Cache96 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length280 mmno data
Width3-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6LPDDR5X
Maximum RAM amount48 GB128 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz1067 MHz
Memory bandwidth864.0 GB/s273.2 GB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors3x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.11x HDMI
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)N/A
Shader Model6.7N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL2.23.0
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA-12.1
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 April 2023 1 June 2026
Maximum RAM amount 48 GB 128 GB

N1 16SM has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 167% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Radeon PRO W7900 and N1 16SM. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon PRO W7900 is a workstation graphics card while N1 16SM is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 90 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate N1 16SM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon PRO W7900 or N1 16SM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.