CMP 100HX-210 vs Radeon PRO W7800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking28not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation13.40no data
Power efficiency19.55no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)Volta (2017−2020)
GPU code nameNavi 31GV100
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date13 April 2023 (3 years ago)2020 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores44805120
Core clock speed1895 MHz555 MHz
Boost clock speed2525 MHz1147 MHz
Number of transistors57,700 million21,100 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)260 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate707.0367.0
Floating-point processing power45.25 TFLOPS11.75 TFLOPS
ROPs128128
TMUs280320
Tensor Coresno data640
Ray Tracing Cores70no data
L0 Cache2.2 MBno data
L1 Cache2 MB7.5 MB
L2 Cache6 MB6 MB
L3 Cache64 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x1
Length280 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6HBM2
Maximum RAM amount32 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz810 MHz
Memory bandwidth576.0 GB/s829.4 GB/s
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors3x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1No outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.86.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.23.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-7.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 5 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 260 Watt 250 Watt

PRO W7800 has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 140% more advanced lithography process.

CMP 100HX-210, on the other hand, has 4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon PRO W7800 and CMP 100HX-210. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 40 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 9 votes

Rate CMP 100HX-210 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon PRO W7800 or CMP 100HX-210, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.