Radeon RX 8050S vs PRO W7600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
PRO W7500 PRO W7600 PRO W7700 PRO W7800 PRO W7800 48 GB PRO W7900
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
5500M 6500M 6550M 6600M 6800M 7600M 7600M XT 7700S 7900M 8040S 8050S 8060S

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon PRO W7600 with Radeon RX 8050S, including specs and performance data.

PRO W7600
2023, $599
8 GB GDDR6, 130 Watt
39.52
+10.8%

PRO W7600 outperforms 8050S by a moderate 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
PRO W7600 PRO W7600
RX 8050S RX 8050S

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking129162
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation38.85no data
Power efficiency23.46no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)no data
GPU code nameNavi 33no data
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date3 August 2023 (3 years ago)6 January 2025 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores204832
Boost clock speed2440 MHz2800 MHz
Number of transistors13,300 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology6 nmno data
Power consumption (TDP)130 Wattno data
Texture fill rate312.3no data
ROPs64no data
TMUs128no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8no data
Length241 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount8 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed18 GB/sno data
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 2.1no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)no data
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.2no data
Vulkan1.3-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD100−110
+6.4%
94
−6.4%

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.99no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Palworld 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 100
+0%
100
+0%
Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Palworld 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Valorant 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 96
+0%
96
+0%
Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 118
+0%
118
+0%
Metro Exodus 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Palworld 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 156
+0%
156
+0%
Valorant 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 85
+0%
85
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 92
+0%
92
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Palworld 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Valorant 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Palworld 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Palworld 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Valorant 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Palworld 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

This is how PRO W7600 and RX 8050S compete in popular games:

  • PRO W7600 is 6% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 59 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 39.52 35.67
Recency 3 August 2023 6 January 2025

PRO W7600 has a 11% higher aggregate performance score.

RX 8050S, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.

The Radeon PRO W7600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 8050S in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon PRO W7600 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 8050S is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

PRO W7600 Radeon PRO W7600
vs
Tesla T10 Tesla T10
RX 8050S Radeon RX 8050S
vs
RTX 2080 Mobile GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
PRO W7600 Radeon PRO W7600
vs
Quadro T1000 Quadro T1000
RTX 3060 GDDR6X NVIDIA RTX 3060 GDDR6X
vs
RTX 4060 AD106 4060 AD106
PRO W7800 AMD Radeon PRO W7800
vs
RX 8050S RX 8050S
RX 7600 AMD Radeon RX 7600
vs
GTX TITAN GTX TITAN
RX 7600 AMD Radeon RX 7600
vs
FirePro W600 FirePro W600
RX 7600 AMD Radeon RX 7600
vs
Pro V620 Pro V620
PRO W7600 AMD Radeon PRO W7600
vs
Arc Pro B60 Dual Pro B60 Dual
PRO W7700 AMD Radeon PRO W7700
vs
RTX A1000 RTX A1000
PRO W7700 AMD Radeon PRO W7700
vs
RX 8050S RX 8050S
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
vs
Arc Pro B60 Dual Pro B60 Dual
Steam Deck 8CU AMD Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
vs
Graphics (Ryzen 9000) Graphics (Ryzen 9000)

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.9 8 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon RX 8050S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon PRO W7600 or Radeon RX 8050S, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.