Radeon RX 640 OEM vs PRO W7600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking128not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation38.79no data
Power efficiency23.60no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3 (2023−2025)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameNavi 33Polaris 23
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date3 August 2023 (3 years ago)9 April 2020 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048640
Core clock speed1720 MHz1295 MHz
Boost clock speed2440 MHzno data
Number of transistors13.3 billion2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate312.351.80
Floating-point processing powerno data1.658 TFLOPS
ROPs6416
TMUs12840
Ray Tracing Cores32no data
L0 Cache512 KBno data
L1 Cache512 KB160 KB
L2 Cache2 MB512 KB
L3 Cache32 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x8
Length241 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s96 GB/s
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 2.11x DisplayPort 1.4a, 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.96.7 (6.4)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.1
Vulkan1.41.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 August 2023 9 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 50 Watt

PRO W7600 has an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 57% more advanced lithography process.

RX 640 OEM, on the other hand, has 62% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon PRO W7600 and Radeon RX 640 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon PRO W7600 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 640 OEM is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.9 8 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 28 votes

Rate Radeon RX 640 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon PRO W7600 or Radeon RX 640 OEM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.