Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 900 vs Radeon PRO W7600

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking129not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation38.86no data
Power efficiency23.46no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)Gen. 3 (2005)
GPU code nameNavi 33GMA 900
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date3 August 2023 (3 years ago)1 March 2005 (21 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20484
Boost clock speed2440 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistors13,300 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology6 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Wattno data
Texture fill rate312.3no data
ROPs64no data
TMUs128no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8no data
Length241 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount8 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed18 GB/sno data
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 2.1no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)no data
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.2no data
Vulkan1.3-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 August 2023 1 March 2005
Chip lithography 6 nm 130 nm

PRO W7600 has an age advantage of 18 years, and a 2067% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon PRO W7600 and Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 900. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon PRO W7600 is a workstation graphics card while Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 900 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.9 8 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 21 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon PRO W7600 or Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 900, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.