GeForce 6200 SE TurboCache vs Radeon PRO W7600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking129not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation38.86no data
Power efficiency23.46no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameNavi 33NV44 A2
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date3 August 2023 (3 years ago)15 December 2004 (21 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048no data
Core clock speedno data350 MHz
Boost clock speed2440 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,300 million75 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Wattno data
Texture fill rate312.31.400
ROPs642
TMUs1284

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 1.0 x16
Length241 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR
Maximum RAM amount8 GB64 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed18 GB/s250 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s4 GB/s
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 2.11x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.73.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL2.2N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 August 2023 15 December 2004
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 6 nm 110 nm

PRO W7600 has an age advantage of 18 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1733% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon PRO W7600 and GeForce 6200 SE TurboCache. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon PRO W7600 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce 6200 SE TurboCache is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.9 8 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 11 votes

Rate GeForce 6200 SE TurboCache on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon PRO W7600 or GeForce 6200 SE TurboCache, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.