ATI FireGL V8600 vs Radeon PRO W7600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking129not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation38.86no data
Power efficiency23.46no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameNavi 33R600
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date3 August 2023 (3 years ago)14 May 2007 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 $1,899

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048320
Core clock speedno data688 MHz
Boost clock speed2440 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,300 million720 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt159 Watt
Texture fill rate312.311.01
Floating-point processing powerno data0.4403 TFLOPS
ROPs6416
TMUs12816
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 1.0 x16
Length241 mm254 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR4
Maximum RAM amount8 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed18 GB/s868 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s111.1 GB/s
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 2.11x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)10.0 (10_0)
Shader Model6.74.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.2N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 August 2023 14 May 2007
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 159 Watt

PRO W7600 has an age advantage of 16 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 1233% more advanced lithography process, and 22% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon PRO W7600 and FireGL V8600. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.9 8 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate FireGL V8600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon PRO W7600 or FireGL V8600, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.