Radeon RX 9070 XT vs PRO W7500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon PRO W7500 with Radeon RX 9070 XT, including specs and performance data.

PRO W7500
2023, $429
8 GB GDDR6, 70 Watt
31.59
RX 9070 XT
2025, $599
16 GB GDDR6, 304 Watt
64.34
+104%

9070 XT outperforms PRO W7500 by a whopping 104% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking20032
Place by popularitynot in top-10018
Cost-effectiveness evaluation39.1763.79
Power efficiency35.1516.48
ArchitectureRDNA 3 (2023−2025)RDNA 4.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameNavi 33Navi 48
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date3 August 2023 (3 years ago)6 March 2025 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$429 $599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

RX 9070 XT has 63% better value for money than PRO W7500.

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17924096
Core clock speed1500 MHz1660 MHz
Boost clock speed1700 MHz2970 MHz
Number of transistors13.3 billion53,900 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)70 Watt304 Watt
Texture fill rate190.4760.3
Floating-point processing powerno data48.66 TFLOPS
ROPs64128
TMUs112256
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Cores2864
L0 Cache448 KB1 MB
L1 Cache512 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MB8 MB
L3 Cache32 MB64 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 5.0 x16
Length216 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz2518 MHz
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/s644.6 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 2.11x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.96.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.2
Vulkan1.41.4
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

PRO W7500 31.59
RX 9070 XT 64.34
+104%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

PRO W7500 13215
Samples: 118
RX 9070 XT 26919
+104%
Samples: 18198

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD100−110206
+106%
1440p55−60
−52.6%
116
4K35−4073
+109%

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.292.91
+32.2%
1440p7.805.16
+33.8%
4K12.268.21
+33.1%
  • RX 9070 XT has 32% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX 9070 XT has 34% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RX 9070 XT has 33% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 200−210 200−210
Counter-Strike 2 300−350 300−350
Cyberpunk 2077 160−170 160−170

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 200−210 200−210
Battlefield 5 170−180 170−180
Counter-Strike 2 300−350 300−350
Cyberpunk 2077 160−170 160−170
Far Cry 5 296 296
Fortnite 300−350 300−350
Forza Horizon 4 250−260 250−260
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
Valorant 350−400 350−400

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 200−210 200−210
Battlefield 5 170−180 170−180
Counter-Strike 2 300−350 300−350
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 270−280
Cyberpunk 2077 160−170 160−170
Far Cry 5 285 285
Far Cry 6 265 265
Fortnite 300−350 300−350
Forza Horizon 4 250−260 250−260
Grand Theft Auto V 170−180 170−180
Metro Exodus 160−170 160−170
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 497 497
Valorant 350−400 350−400

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 170−180 170−180
Cyberpunk 2077 160−170 160−170
Far Cry 5 270 270
Forza Horizon 4 250−260 250−260
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 257 257
Valorant 350−400 350−400

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 300−350 300−350

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 190−200 190−200
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 500−550 500−550
Far Cry 6 210 210
Grand Theft Auto V 130−140 130−140
Metro Exodus 110−120 110−120
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
Valorant 450−500 450−500

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 160−170 160−170
Cyberpunk 2077 90−95 90−95
Far Cry 5 260 260
Forza Horizon 4 220−230 220−230
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 197 197

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 150−160 150−160

4K
High

Atomic Heart 60−65 60−65
Counter-Strike 2 85−90 85−90
Far Cry 6 126 126
Grand Theft Auto V 160−170 160−170
Metro Exodus 70−75 70−75
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 168 168
Valorant 300−350 300−350

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 120−130 120−130
Counter-Strike 2 85−90 85−90
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50 45−50
Far Cry 5 152 152
Forza Horizon 4 170−180 170−180
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100 95−100

4K
Epic

Fortnite 75−80 75−80

This is how PRO W7500 and RX 9070 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 9070 XT is 106% faster in 1080p
  • RX 9070 XT is 111% faster in 1440p
  • RX 9070 XT is 109% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 61 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 31.59 64.34
Recency 3 August 2023 6 March 2025
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 70 Watt 304 Watt

PRO W7500 has 77% lower power consumption.

RX 9070 XT, on the other hand, has a 104% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 33% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 9070 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon PRO W7500 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon PRO W7500 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 9070 XT is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 23 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 3949 votes

Rate Radeon RX 9070 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon PRO W7500 or Radeon RX 9070 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.