RTX A4 Mobile vs Radeon PRO W7500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking199not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation39.44no data
Power efficiency35.05no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameNavi 33GA107
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date3 August 2023 (3 years ago)12 April 2021 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$429 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17922048
Core clock speed1500 MHz1297 MHz
Boost clock speed1700 MHz1770 MHz
Number of transistors13,300 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology6 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)70 Wattno data
Texture fill rate190.4113.3
Floating-point processing power12.19 TFLOPS7.25 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs11264
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Cores2816
L0 Cache448 KBno data
L1 Cache512 KB2 MB
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB
L3 Cache32 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Length216 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1344 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth172.0 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 2.1Portable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.23.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 August 2023 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 8 nm

PRO W7500 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 33% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon PRO W7500 and RTX A4 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon PRO W7500 is a workstation graphics card while RTX A4 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 23 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate RTX A4 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon PRO W7500 or RTX A4 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.