Apple M4 20-core GPU vs Radeon PRO W7500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking200not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation39.34no data
Power efficiency35.11no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3 (2023−2025)no data
GPU code nameNavi 33no data
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date3 August 2023 (3 years ago)30 October 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$429 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores179220
Core clock speed1500 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1700 MHzno data
Number of transistors13.3 billionno data
Manufacturing process technology6 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)70 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate190.4no data
ROPs64no data
TMUs112no data
Ray Tracing Cores28no data
L0 Cache448 KBno data
L1 Cache512 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MBno data
L3 Cache32 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8no data
Length216 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6LPDDR5x-8533
Maximum RAM amount8 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed2000 MHz8533 MHz
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 2.1no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)no data
Shader Model6.9no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.4-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 August 2023 30 October 2024
Chip lithography 6 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 70 Watt 45 Watt

Apple M4 20-core GPU has an age advantage of 1 year, a 50% more advanced lithography process, and 36% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon PRO W7500 and M4 20-core GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon PRO W7500 is a workstation graphics card while Apple M4 20-core GPU is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 23 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 58 votes

Rate M4 20-core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon PRO W7500 or M4 20-core GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.