A40 PCIe vs Radeon PRO W7500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking199not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation39.76no data
Power efficiency35.00no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameNavi 33GA102
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date3 August 2023 (3 years ago)5 October 2020 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$429 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores179210752
Core clock speed1500 MHz1305 MHz
Boost clock speed1700 MHz1755 MHz
Number of transistors13,300 million28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)70 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate190.4589.7
Floating-point processing power12.19 TFLOPS37.74 TFLOPS
ROPs64112
TMUs112336
Tensor Coresno data336
Ray Tracing Cores2884
L0 Cache448 KBno data
L1 Cache512 KB10.5 MB
L2 Cache2 MB6 MB
L3 Cache32 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Length216 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB48 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1344 MHz1812 MHz
Memory bandwidth172.0 GB/s695.8 GB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 2.13x DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.22.0
Vulkan1.31.2
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 August 2023 5 October 2020
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 48 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 70 Watt 300 Watt

PRO W7500 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 33% more advanced lithography process, and 329% lower power consumption.

A40 PCIe, on the other hand, has a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Radeon PRO W7500 and A40 PCIe. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 23 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 89 votes

Rate A40 PCIe on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon PRO W7500 or A40 PCIe, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.