RTX A500 vs Radeon PRO W6300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon PRO W6300 and RTX A500, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

PRO W6300
2022
2 GB GDDR6, 25 Watt
13.34

RTX A500 outperforms PRO W6300 by a moderate 18% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking424381
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency41.2820.26
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameNavi 24GA107
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date19 January 2022 (4 years ago)10 November 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7682048
Core clock speed1512 MHz1440 MHz
Boost clock speed2040 MHz1770 MHz
Number of transistors5,400 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology6 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate97.92113.3
Floating-point processing power3.133 TFLOPS7.25 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs4864
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Cores1216
L0 Cache192 KBno data
L1 Cache256 KB2 MB
L2 Cache1024 KB2 MB
L3 Cache8 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x8
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width32 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.23.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

PRO W6300 13.34
RTX A500 15.71
+17.8%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

PRO W6300 5559
Samples: 8
RTX A500 6544
+17.7%
Samples: 935

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.34 15.71
Recency 19 January 2022 10 November 2021
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 60 Watt

PRO W6300 has an age advantage of 2 months, a 33% more advanced lithography process, and 140% lower power consumption.

RTX A500, on the other hand, has a 18% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The RTX A500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon PRO W6300 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 170 votes

Rate RTX A500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon PRO W6300 or RTX A500, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.