GeForce 9300M GS GDDR3 vs ATI Radeon LE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 6 (2000−2007)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameRage 6G98
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 May 2001 (25 years ago)4 June 2008 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data8
Core clock speed148 MHz580 MHz
Number of transistors30 million210 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data13 Watt
Texture fill rate0.892.320
Floating-point processing powerno data0.0232 TFLOPS
ROPs24
TMUs64
L2 Cacheno data16 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xMXM-I
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR3
Maximum RAM amount32 MB256 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed148 MHz702 MHz
Memory bandwidth4.736 GB/s11.23 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGAPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.011.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGL1.33.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 May 2001 4 June 2008
Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 256 MB
Chip lithography 180 nm 65 nm

9300M GS GDDR3 has an age advantage of 7 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 177% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon LE and GeForce 9300M GS GDDR3. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon LE is a desktop graphics card while GeForce 9300M GS GDDR3 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon LE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 3 votes

Rate GeForce 9300M GS GDDR3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon LE or GeForce 9300M GS GDDR3, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.