GeForce RTX 4070 vs Radeon Instinct MI25

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Instinct MI25 with GeForce RTX 4070, including specs and performance data.

Instinct MI25
2017
16 GB HBM2, 300 Watt
9.10

RTX 4070 outperforms MI25 by a whopping 609% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking53332
Place by popularitynot in top-10077
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data62.73
Power efficiency2.3524.95
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameVega 10AD104
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date27 June 2017 (9 years ago)12 April 2023 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096 ×25888
Core clock speed1400 MHz1920 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHz2475 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate384.0 ×2455.4
Floating-point processing power12.29 TFLOPS ×229.15 TFLOPS
ROPs64 ×264
TMUs256 ×2184
Tensor Coresno data184
Ray Tracing Coresno data46
L1 Cache1 MB5.8 MB
L2 Cache4 MB36 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm240 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount16 GB ×212 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit ×2192 Bit
Memory clock speed852 MHz1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth436.2 GB/s ×2504.2 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.1.1251.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Instinct MI25 9.10
RTX 4070 64.50
+609%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Instinct MI25 3791
Samples: 10
RTX 4070 26871
+609%
Samples: 20189

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD27−30
−633%
198
+633%
1440p14−16
−643%
104
+643%
4K8−9
−688%
63
+688%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.03
1440pno data5.76
4Kno data9.51

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 216
+0%
216
+0%
Palworld 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 240
+0%
240
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 174
+0%
174
+0%
Far Cry 5 249
+0%
249
+0%
Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Palworld 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 143
+0%
143
+0%
Far Cry 5 234
+0%
234
+0%
Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 174
+0%
174
+0%
Metro Exodus 170
+0%
170
+0%
Palworld 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 351
+0%
351
+0%
Valorant 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 128
+0%
128
+0%
Far Cry 5 218
+0%
218
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 171
+0%
171
+0%
Valorant 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Palworld 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 500−550
+0%
500−550
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 137
+0%
137
+0%
Metro Exodus 104
+0%
104
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 450−500
+0%
450−500
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 81
+0%
81
+0%
Far Cry 5 173
+0%
173
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 140
+0%
140
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Palworld 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 146
+0%
146
+0%
Metro Exodus 65
+0%
65
+0%
Palworld 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 117
+0%
117
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 36
+0%
36
+0%
Far Cry 5 93
+0%
93
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Palworld 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

This is how Instinct MI25 and RTX 4070 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4070 is 633% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4070 is 643% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4070 is 688% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 62 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.10 64.50
Recency 27 June 2017 12 April 2023
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 200 Watt

Instinct MI25 has a 33% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX 4070, on the other hand, has a 609% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 50% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 4070 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Instinct MI25 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Instinct MI25 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 4070 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 13 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI25 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 12846 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Instinct MI25 or GeForce RTX 4070, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.