GeForce 9300 SE vs ATI Radeon IGP 350M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon IGP 350M with GeForce 9300 SE, including specs and performance data.

ATI IGP 350M
2002
0.01

9300 SE outperforms IGP 350M by a whopping 1800% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking15881479
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 6 (2000−2007)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameRS200G98
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date5 October 2002 (23 years ago)1 June 2008 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data8
Core clock speed183 MHz540 MHz
Number of transistors30 million210 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm65 nm
Texture fill rate0.374.320
Floating-point processing powerno data0.0208 TFLOPS
ROPs24
TMUs28
L2 Cacheno data16 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 2.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR2
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared256 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared400 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data6.4 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.011.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGL1.43.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.1

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

ATI IGP 350M 0.01
9300 SE 0.19
+1800%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI IGP 350M 6
Samples: 2
9300 SE 81
+1250%
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.01 0.19
Recency 5 October 2002 1 June 2008
Chip lithography 180 nm 65 nm

9300 SE has a 1800% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 177% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce 9300 SE is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon IGP 350M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon IGP 350M is a notebook graphics card while GeForce 9300 SE is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 13 votes

Rate Radeon IGP 350M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 5 votes

Rate GeForce 9300 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon IGP 350M or GeForce 9300 SE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.