Tegra 4 GPU vs ATI Radeon IGP 340

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 6 (2000−2007)VLIW Vec4 (2010−2013)
GPU code nameRS200Tegra 4
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date5 October 2002 (23 years ago)1 August 2013 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Core clock speed183 MHz672 MHz
Number of transistors30 million11 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data20 Watt
Texture fill rate0.372.688
ROPs24
TMUs24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xIGP
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.0N/A
OpenGL1.4ES 3.0
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 October 2002 1 August 2013
Chip lithography 180 nm 28 nm

Tegra 4 GPU has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 543% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon IGP 340 and Tegra 4 GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon IGP 340 is a desktop graphics card while Tegra 4 GPU is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 4 votes

Rate Radeon IGP 340 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Tegra 4 GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon IGP 340 or Tegra 4 GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.