Iris Xe Graphics 80EU vs ATI Radeon IGP 320

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1608not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)Generation 12.2 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameRS100Raptor Lake GT1
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date5 October 2002 (23 years ago)4 January 2023 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data640
Core clock speed160 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1450 MHz
Number of transistors30 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology180 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rate0.1658.00
Floating-point processing powerno data1.856 TFLOPS
ROPs120
TMUs140
L2 Cacheno data1024 KB
L3 Cacheno data12 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xRing Bus
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGL1.44.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 October 2002 4 January 2023
Chip lithography 180 nm 10 nm

Iris Xe Graphics 80EU has an age advantage of 20 years, and a 1700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon IGP 320 and Iris Xe Graphics 80EU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon IGP 320 is a desktop graphics card while Iris Xe Graphics 80EU is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Radeon IGP 320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 326 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics 80EU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon IGP 320 or Iris Xe Graphics 80EU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.