Iris Xe Graphics MAX vs Radeon HD 8970M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 8970M with Iris Xe Graphics MAX, including specs and performance data.

HD 8970M
2013
4 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
9.30
+116%

HD 8970M outperforms Graphics MAX by a whopping 116% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking523726
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.1913.34
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameNeptuneDG1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date14 May 2013 (13 years ago)31 October 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280768
Core clock speed850 MHzno data
Boost clock speed900 MHz1650 MHz
Number of transistors2,800 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate72.0079.20
Floating-point processing power2.304 TFLOPS2.534 TFLOPS
ROPs3224
TMUs8048
L1 Cache320 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5LPDDR4X
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1200 MHz4.3 GB/s
Memory bandwidth153.6 GB/s68.26 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD 8970M 9.30
+116%
Iris Xe Graphics MAX 4.31

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 8970M 3876
+116%
Samples: 51
Iris Xe Graphics MAX 1797
Samples: 9

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD53
+121%
24−27
−121%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+138%
21−24
−138%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+138%
8−9
−138%
Palworld 21−24
+120%
10−11
−120%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 18−20
+125%
8−9
−125%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 40−45
+128%
18−20
−128%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+138%
21−24
−138%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+138%
8−9
−138%
Far Cry 5 30−33
+150%
12−14
−150%
Fortnite 55−60
+133%
24−27
−133%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+128%
18−20
−128%
Palworld 21−24
+120%
10−11
−120%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+143%
14−16
−143%
Valorant 90−95
+125%
40−45
−125%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 40−45
+128%
18−20
−128%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+138%
21−24
−138%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 148
+128%
65−70
−128%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+138%
8−9
−138%
Dota 2 65−70
+127%
30−33
−127%
Far Cry 5 30−33
+150%
12−14
−150%
Fortnite 55−60
+133%
24−27
−133%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+128%
18−20
−128%
Grand Theft Auto V 39
+117%
18−20
−117%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+138%
8−9
−138%
Palworld 21−24
+120%
10−11
−120%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+143%
14−16
−143%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 31
+121%
14−16
−121%
Valorant 90−95
+125%
40−45
−125%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 40−45
+128%
18−20
−128%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+138%
8−9
−138%
Dota 2 65−70
+127%
30−33
−127%
Far Cry 5 30−33
+150%
12−14
−150%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+128%
18−20
−128%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+143%
14−16
−143%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18
+125%
8−9
−125%
Valorant 90−95
+125%
40−45
−125%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 55−60
+133%
24−27
−133%
Palworld 21−24
+120%
10−11
−120%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+143%
7−8
−143%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
+137%
30−33
−137%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+133%
21−24
−133%
Valorant 95−100
+138%
40−45
−138%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21−24
+130%
10−11
−130%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+122%
9−10
−122%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+120%
10−11
−120%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+117%
6−7
−117%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 20−22
+122%
9−10
−122%
Palworld 12−14
+117%
6−7
−117%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
+122%
9−10
−122%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Palworld 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Valorant 40−45
+133%
18−20
−133%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Dota 2 35−40
+119%
16−18
−119%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+129%
7−8
−129%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Palworld 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%

This is how HD 8970M and Iris Xe Graphics MAX compete in popular games:

  • HD 8970M is 121% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.30 4.31
Recency 14 May 2013 31 October 2020
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 25 Watt

HD 8970M has a 116% higher aggregate performance score.

Iris Xe Graphics MAX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 300% lower power consumption.

The Radeon HD 8970M is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Xe Graphics MAX in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8970M is a notebook graphics card while Iris Xe Graphics MAX is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 51 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8970M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 254 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics MAX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8970M or Iris Xe Graphics MAX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.