Tesla S2050 vs Radeon HD 8750M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking875not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameMarsGF100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date26 February 2013 (13 years ago)25 July 2011 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$11,999

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384448 ×4
Core clock speed670 MHz574 MHz
Boost clock speed775 MHzno data
Number of transistors950 million3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data900 Watt
Texture fill rate16.0832.14 ×4
Floating-point processing power0.5146 TFLOPS1.028 TFLOPS ×4
ROPs848 ×4
TMUs2456 ×4
L1 Cache96 KB896 KB
L2 Cache256 KB768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB3 GB ×4
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit ×4
Memory clock speed1000 MHz773 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s148.4 GB/s ×4
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)5.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.1 (1.2)1.1
Vulkan1.2.170N/A
CUDA-2.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 February 2013 25 July 2011
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 3 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm

HD 8750M has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 43% more advanced lithography process.

Tesla S2050, on the other hand, has a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8750M and Tesla S2050. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8750M is a notebook graphics card while Tesla S2050 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 224 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8750M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 58 votes

Rate Tesla S2050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8750M or Tesla S2050, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.