Tesla K80m vs Radeon HD 8670D

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1107not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.94no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)
GPU code nameDevastatorGK210
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date12 March 2013 (13 years ago)17 November 2014 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3842x 2496
Core clock speed844 MHz562 MHz
Boost clock speed950 MHz824 MHz
Number of transistors1,303 million7,100 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate22.802x 182.2 billion/sec
Floating-point processing power0.7296 TFLOPSno data
ROPs82x 48
TMUs242x 208

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2x 12 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared2x 384 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared5012 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data2x 240.6 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12.0 (11_1)
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.2no data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 March 2013 17 November 2014
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 300 Watt

HD 8670D has 200% lower power consumption.

Tesla K80m, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 14% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8670D and Tesla K80m. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8670D is a desktop graphics card while Tesla K80m is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 78 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8670D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 13 votes

Rate Tesla K80m on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8670D or Tesla K80m, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.